I read The Giver, by Lois Lowry sometime back in
the 90’s, and again just this week, and my perception and appreciation of the
book have definitely changed. Perhaps it’s just age, and experience. Sometimes
I feel like I’ve lived most of my life in a fog. I wish I’d kept notes about my
initial reaction to the book. What kept me from enjoying it last time the way
that I did this time? If I wasn’t old enough to really appreciate it in the 90’s,
how can young adults appreciate it? I’m sure there are plenty of thoughtful,
sensitive young adults who can appreciate a book like The Giver, but I apparently wasn’t one of them.
I hardly remember
what I made of the book the first time I read it, but I know that I gave it
three stars out of five, which in Goodreads parlance means that I “liked it”.
This week, I moved it up to four stars, which means that I “really liked it”. (The
final category, five stars, means “it was amazing”, which is a ranking that I
don’t give out too freely, though I debated it for this book.)
The story is of a
community that has opted, for safety and predictability, to remove the things
that complicate and endanger society. Of course, the things that make life
complicated and dangerous are also the things that can make life exciting and
beautiful. Life in the society has been relegated to that of Sameness, where
the decisions of what job to pursue, or even who to marry, are made by a committee
that is less likely to be swayed by foolish emotion. In fact, no one in the
society is likely to be swayed much by emotion, as emotions themselves have
been eliminated as much as possible.
When Jonas, the protagonist,
is named as the new Receiver of Memory, he is tasked with inheriting all of
society’s memories, both the beautiful and the painful, and the role has him
asking himself some difficult questions about what the society has had to give
up in order to achieve the level of safety and security that it has achieved.
I was absolutely sucked
into the story when Jonas received his instructions on how to begin his new
role as the Receiver of Memory. The short list ended with Number 8. “You may
lie.” By this point in the story, this list of how to begin on his path as the
Receiver of Memory rocked Jonas, and rocked me as a reader. The instructions
that Jonas received, and the doubt and confusion they created, were
phenomenally well written.
The story is
wonderfully told. When the title character of The Giver has to inflict painful
memories on Jonas, the horror of the event, and the pain it obviously causes
both the Giver and Receiver, is simply and powerfully told.
The story ends
promisingly, though not unambiguously. Jonas and Gabriel, a baby that Jonas has
come to love, are on their way to a future and location that look hopeful, but
we aren’t given the details of the outcome.
Maybe that
ambiguous ending is what threw me last time. Now I’m happier with the ambiguity
than I might have been twenty years ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment