Several years
ago, never mind how many, I came across an academic who claimed that Don Quixote was one of the few works
that really stood up to multiple readings throughout life. In fact, the scholar
claimed that Don Quixote required
multiple readings. Specifically, he recommended that everyone read Don Quixote at least three times, once
as a young adult, once in middle age, and once in old age.
I’ve thought a
lot about this recommendation in the intervening years. In fact, the idea of
books that warrant and reward multiple readings has shaped the way I think
about literature, and I’ve created my own short list of books that could reward
multiple readings every twenty years or so. I’ve identified six works that I found
especially meaningful and rewarding when I first read them in my twenties.
Those six are the Bible, “Oedipus Rex”, “King Lear”, Don Quixote, Moby Dick,
and The Brothers Karamazov. Now, as I
approach the end of my forties, I find myself revisiting that list, and
rereading works that I read in my twenties. I have a couple of years left in my
40’s, and a couple more works to finish: Don
Quixote and The Brothers Karamazov.
So, for the next
several weeks, I’ll be spending time with Don Quixote, as part of my Quixotic
quest to revisit some rewarding literature, and to live like literature can
have an impact on one’s life.
To be honest, I
struggle with Don Quixote. I remember
from my first reading twenty years ago that the second part of the book really
began to feel painful, that the mockery that Don Quixote is subjected to by the
other characters in the book seemed extreme and almost sadistic. I also
remember that the saving feature of the book was the presence of Sancho Panza,
and the caring relationship that develops between Quixote and Panza.
With that in
mind, I’ve begun this reading already sensitive to the mockery and mistreatment
of Don Quixote and Sancho Panza, and even the first part of the book has been painful
to read. I clearly don’t view the novel the same way this reading that I did in
my first reading. I think I was able to enjoy the slapstick, and laugh at the
misadventures of Don Quixote and Sancho. Now it feels too much like I am
expected to laugh at Don Quixote and
Sancho, and I don’t view them as only comic characters anymore. They are much
deeper than that. Sancho has an earthly wisdom mixed in with his simplicity.
I’m still struggling with how to view the knight himself. My initial reaction
with this reading is that he is a deluded old man, and I find myself responding
to him more with pity than amusement. Perhaps that’s inspired from the very
first page of the novel, where we are told “Our gentleman, who bordered upon
fifty, was of a tough constitution, extremely lean, and hard-featured, an early
riser, and in point of exercise, another Nimrod.” (Apparently, the reference to
Nimrod is not in the original Spanish. The translation I’m reading, by Tobias
Smollett, comes highly recommended, but even on page one there is brought up
the dilemma of translation; how much is lost in moving a work from one language
into another? A lot, I’m sure, but there’s no getting around it.)
My point in that
last quote? Quixote and I are the same age! No wonder I’m a little more
sensitive to his mistreatment. So, like the knight, I’ll turn my shoulders
toward the task and march through this reading. I know once I really get
moving, I will get caught up in the book.
No comments:
Post a Comment